We performed multiple rundown tests on the “clean” Surface tablet as well as with the Epic Games Store signed in. On the Surface Pro 7+ running Intel’s 11th-gen Ice Lake processor, the differences were significant. The other tests were merely edge cases, simply to see if other behaviors made a difference. The first two tests-the clean PC versus signed in to the Epic Games Store-were what we were concerned with. Somewhat exasperated at this point, we reset the PC-and our battery test finally again generated a score consistent with our earlier results. And another, each requiring hours at a time. In the case of the Surface Pro 7+, the first two test runs provided consistent results the third did not. To be clear, the first two results were consistent. PCWorld has traditionally used a video rundown test, where we loop a video over and over until the battery expires. But we ran into an odd anomaly while testing: The battery life tests we ran didn’t deliver consistent results. Tablets are simply an extreme example.īecause of the incredible leap in graphics performance engendered by Intel’s new Iris Xe GPU, we wanted to test its capabilities in a few games. Who games on a tablet? Good question. As processor and GPU performance increases, more and more platforms are becoming hybrid productivity and gaming machines. Our discovery was a by-product of testing the Microsoft Surface Pro 7+ tablet, which uses a tablet-class Intel “Tiger Lake” Core processor inside. What we wanted to know was whether the Epic Games Store, even while hidden, was the culprit behind our lower battery life. Normally, these taskbar icons are hidden on the Windows 10 Taskbar, and they’re easy to forget.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |